MPG to L/100 km Converter

By: Calculator Grid

Fuel Economy Converter

Convert instantly among US mpg, UK mpg, liters per 100 kilometers, and kilometers per liter.

30.00 US mpg7.84 L/100 kmLive four-way conversion

Enter any one value

US mpg
Positive decimal, for example 30.
UK mpg
Imperial gallon measure.
L/100 km
Lower values indicate lower consumption.
km/L
Higher values indicate more distance per liter.
Workbook ready for the current example.

Converted values

Primary result30.00 US mpg
US fuel economy30.00 mpg
UK fuel economy36.03 mpg
Fuel consumption7.84 L/100 km
Metric fuel economy12.75 km/L
30.00 US mpg equals 7.84 liters per 100 kilometers.

Conversion detail

Measure Value Efficiency direction
Miles per US gallon 30.0000 Higher is better
Miles per UK gallon 36.0285 Higher is better
Liters per 100 kilometers 7.8405 Lower is better
Kilometers per liter 12.7543 Higher is better
The converter preserves full precision internally and rounds only the displayed values.

How to use the fuel economy converter

What this calculator does

This calculator translates one fuel-economy or fuel-consumption value into four widely used units: Miles per US gallon, Miles per UK gallon, Liters per 100 kilometers, and Kilometers per liter. It is useful when comparing vehicle specifications from different countries, reading an imported vehicle listing, checking a dashboard display, or translating a road-test result. It performs unit conversion only; it does not predict your personal fuel bill, emissions, driving range, or real-world mileage. Those outcomes also depend on route, weather, speed, vehicle load, maintenance, and fuel price.

When to use it

Use the converter when a US vehicle listing gives mpg but a European comparison uses L/100 km; when a UK review reports imperial mpg; when a trip log records km/L; or when you want to check whether two apparently different ratings actually describe the same consumption. The US Environmental Protection Agency explains how official vehicle labels present fuel economy and related comparison information on its fuel economy label guide.

How to calculate

  1. The calculator opens with a ready-to-use demonstration of 30 US mpg. All equivalent fields and the Excel workbook are already populated.
  2. Replace any one field with your own positive decimal value. The field you edit becomes the source, and the other three update immediately.
  3. Read the primary result and the four result cards. Remember that higher mpg or km/L means better efficiency, while lower L/100 km means better efficiency.
  4. Review the conversion-detail table for a consistent four-decimal comparison.
  5. Select Download Excel to save the current inputs and results as a validated .xlsx workbook. Reset clears all four fields and disables export until a complete valid value is entered again.

Input guide

Miles per US gallon is a required positive decimal when used as the source. It means miles traveled per US liquid gallon; 30 is a realistic example. A higher value lowers the equivalent L/100 km. Do not confuse the US gallon with the larger imperial gallon. Miles per UK gallon uses the imperial gallon; 36.03 UK mpg is equivalent to about 30 US mpg. Enter a positive decimal only. Liters per 100 kilometers is fuel consumed over 100 km; 7.84 is the startup example. Lower is more efficient. Do not interpret it like mpg, because its direction is reversed. Kilometers per liter is distance traveled per liter; 12.75 is the startup example. Higher is more efficient. Commas, scientific notation, zero, negative values, and mixed-unit text are rejected to avoid ambiguous parsing.

Output guide

Primary result repeats the active source unit so you can confirm which field drives the conversion. US fuel economy, UK fuel economy, and Metric fuel economy are distance-per-volume measures, so larger values indicate more travel from the same fuel volume. Fuel consumption is shown in L/100 km, so smaller values indicate less fuel used for the same distance. The two summary pills repeat the current US mpg and L/100 km values for quick scanning. Every output is an exact unit identity before display rounding, not a recommendation or forecast. The table's Efficiency direction column helps prevent the common mistake of treating L/100 km as though higher were better.

Worked example

At startup, the source value is 30 US mpg. Using exact distance and US-gallon definitions, kilometers per liter equals 30 × 1.609344 ÷ 3.785411784 = 12.7543 km/L. Liters per 100 kilometers equals 100 ÷ 12.7543 = 7.8405 L/100 km. Converting the same underlying distance and volume to an imperial gallon gives 36.0285 UK mpg. Those values match the first-open cards, table, and workbook. NIST recommends using exact conversion factors where available and rounding only after the calculation; its unit-conversion guidance explains that practice.

How the formulas work

km/L = US mpg × 1.609344 ÷ 3.785411784
L/100 km = 100 ÷ km/L
UK mpg = km/L × 4.54609 ÷ 1.609344

The reciprocal relationship is why a vehicle moving from 10 to 8 L/100 km improves, while a vehicle moving from 25 to 30 mpg also improves. A straight percentage comparison across those two scales can be misleading because one is fuel per distance and the other is distance per fuel. For official US comparisons, the government's FuelEconomy.gov vehicle database provides standardized ratings. EPA also explains that label values are estimates and real-world mileage can differ in its fuel-economy labeling overview.

Common interpretation mistakes

First, do not use the same numerical multiplier for US and UK mpg. The imperial gallon is larger, so the UK mpg number is about 20% higher for the same physical efficiency. Second, do not compare the percentage change in mpg directly with the percentage change in L/100 km; reciprocal scales do not change linearly. Third, avoid rounding intermediate values. Entering 7.84 instead of the more precise 7.8405 is usually harmless for display, but repeated conversions from rounded values can accumulate small errors. Finally, treat official label values as standardized comparison estimates rather than guarantees for every driver or route.