Rivet Size Calculator

By: Calculator Grid

Rivet Size Calculator

Estimate a practical solid-rivet diameter and shank length from the thickness of two joined sheets.

Metric exampleDiameter = 3 × thickest sheetStack: 5.00 mm
Workbook ready.

Joint inputs

Required. Enter a positive thickness in the selected unit.
Required. The thicker sheet controls the diameter estimate.
Changing units converts both current thickness values.

Recommended dimensions

Recommended rivet diameter
9.00 mm
Total material thickness5.00 mm
Required shank length18.50 mm
Shop-head diameter target13.50 mm
Shop-head height target4.50 mm
For 2.00 mm and 3.00 mm sheets, use about a 9.00 mm diameter rivet with an 18.50 mm shank length.

Calculation breakdown

Step Formula Result
Thickest sheet max(2.00, 3.00) 3.00 mm
Rivet diameter 3 × 3.00 9.00 mm
Total stack 2.00 + 3.00 5.00 mm
Shank length 5.00 + 1.5 × 9.00 18.50 mm
This rule-of-thumb estimate is a starting point. Select an available standard rivet size at or above the calculated minimum and verify the joint against the applicable drawing, fastener specification, and structural requirements.

How to use this rivet size calculator

What this calculator does

This calculator estimates four dimensions for a conventional solid-rivet joint: a minimum practical shank diameter, the total grip or material stack, an approximate shank length, and nominal formed shop-head dimensions. It applies the widely used preliminary rule that rivet diameter is about three times the thickness of the thickest sheet. It then adds a forming allowance of 1.5 rivet diameters to the total sheet thickness to estimate shank length. The result is useful for initial selection and workshop planning, but it does not replace a load analysis, approved repair data, manufacturer instructions, or a certified engineering drawing.

When to use it

Use it when planning a lap joint between two sheets, checking whether an existing rivet is long enough to form a shop head, comparing metric and inch stock, or preparing a preliminary bill of materials before choosing the next available standard rivet size. NASA's Fastener Design Manual provides broader design guidance on rivets, materials, fatigue, corrosion, and joint selection.

How to calculate

  1. The calculator opens with a complete demonstration: Sheet 1 thickness is 2 mm and Sheet 2 thickness is 3 mm. Its Excel workbook is ready immediately.
  2. Replace Sheet 1 thickness and Sheet 2 thickness with the actual positive sheet values. Use a period as the decimal separator.
  3. Choose Measurement unit. Switching between millimeters and inches converts both entered values rather than merely relabeling them.
  4. Read Recommended rivet diameter first, then confirm Required shank length. Use the breakdown table to audit each formula step.
  5. Select Download Excel to export the current typed inputs and results to a validated OOXML workbook. Reset clears the demonstration data and disables export until both required thicknesses are complete and valid again.

Input guide

Sheet 1 thickness is required and accepts a positive decimal in the selected unit; 2 mm is the startup example. A larger value raises the total stack and may also raise the recommended diameter if it becomes the thicker sheet. Do not enter a material width, gauge number, or mixed unit. Sheet 2 thickness follows the same rules; the startup value is 3 mm. Because the diameter rule uses the thicker sheet, increasing the thinner sheet affects length but not diameter until it exceeds the other sheet. Measurement unit is a required choice between millimeters and inches. It converts current values using 25.4 mm per inch; do not manually convert and then also change the selector.

Output guide

Recommended rivet diameter is the three-times-thickest-sheet estimate. Total material thickness is the exact sum of both input sheets. Required shank length is the total stack plus 1.5 diameters of allowance for forming the shop head. Shop-head diameter target is 1.5 times shank diameter, while Shop-head height target is 0.5 times shank diameter. These are dimensional estimates, not proof of joint strength. A high value simply reflects thicker material; a zero or missing result means the inputs are incomplete or invalid.

Worked example

With 2.00 mm and 3.00 mm sheets, the thicker sheet is 3.00 mm. The estimated diameter is 3 × 3.00 = 9.00 mm. The material stack is 2.00 + 3.00 = 5.00 mm. Adding the forming allowance gives 5.00 + 1.5 × 9.00 = 18.50 mm, matching the first-open result and workbook. In practice, choose a standard diameter and length that meet or exceed the minimum while respecting the approved joint specification. The FAA's Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook – Airframe is an authoritative source for aircraft sheet-metal practices.

Formula and interpretation

The calculation uses D = 3t, where t is the thickest individual sheet, followed by L = T + 1.5D, where T is the combined material thickness. The diameter formula is deliberately based on the thickest sheet rather than the total stack, because local bearing and deformation around the hole depend strongly on each sheet's thickness. The length formula reserves enough protruding shank to form the driven head. Atlas Copco describes the same three-times-thickness selection rule and 1.5D allowance.

Important: Actual rivet selection also depends on rivet type, material compatibility, hole size, edge distance, pitch, load direction, fatigue, corrosion, installation method, temperature, and the governing specification. For critical or regulated work, use approved engineering data.

Common mistakes

  • Using total stack thickness in the diameter rule instead of the thickest individual sheet.
  • Forgetting the 1.5D protrusion allowance and choosing a rivet whose shank only equals the material stack.
  • Rounding down to a smaller stock size. Preliminary minimums are normally rounded up, subject to the specification.
  • Mixing inches and millimeters. Use the unit selector so every displayed and exported value stays consistent.
  • Treating the result as a structural approval. The NASA manual emphasizes that fastener selection involves fatigue, vibration, corrosion, temperature, and other design factors beyond geometry.